<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Female Body is&#8230; inappropriate?!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brigidsflame.com/feymorgaina/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=4" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brigidsflame.com/feymorgaina/blog/?p=4</link>
	<description>An ever-changing life inspired by the pneuma</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 08:12:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erin</title>
		<link>http://www.brigidsflame.com/feymorgaina/blog/?p=4&#038;cpage=1#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 18:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4#comment-14</guid>
		<description>I agree. This ad may not only give children a sense that there is something wrong with their bodies that they need to be protected from, but may also negatively effect the future of women&#039;s self-image, self esteem, body image and additionally, the way our future men view women.  What is a boy to think upon seeing such an ad, casually tossed on the coffee table?  How does this effect future male-female interactions?  I am not saying this ad could singly be responsible for a greater breakdown in male-female female-female relationships and women&#039;s self-esteem, but it is part of a larger issue. I cannot believe my eyes, that this form of sexual harassment has come from a prominent organization in a position of public influence, in the year 2005.  Who is responsible for approving this trash?  Who is going to protect the children from them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. This ad may not only give children a sense that there is something wrong with their bodies that they need to be protected from, but may also negatively effect the future of women&#8217;s self-image, self esteem, body image and additionally, the way our future men view women.  What is a boy to think upon seeing such an ad, casually tossed on the coffee table?  How does this effect future male-female interactions?  I am not saying this ad could singly be responsible for a greater breakdown in male-female female-female relationships and women&#8217;s self-esteem, but it is part of a larger issue. I cannot believe my eyes, that this form of sexual harassment has come from a prominent organization in a position of public influence, in the year 2005.  Who is responsible for approving this trash?  Who is going to protect the children from them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue</title>
		<link>http://www.brigidsflame.com/feymorgaina/blog/?p=4&#038;cpage=1#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:12:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=4#comment-13</guid>
		<description>Apparently the Bell ad campaign has been Red Tagged thanks to pubic reaction. I understand that this is a precursor to &#039;halted.&#039; Wonder how far away  we are from a public apology ? Thanks for weighing in. Dark ages for sure. Knowing how many hands this campaign passed through  in developement simply floors me.

Good luck with Sprint.

Sue Richards
The Breast Blog</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently the Bell ad campaign has been Red Tagged thanks to pubic reaction. I understand that this is a precursor to &#8216;halted.&#8217; Wonder how far away  we are from a public apology ? Thanks for weighing in. Dark ages for sure. Knowing how many hands this campaign passed through  in developement simply floors me.</p>
<p>Good luck with Sprint.</p>
<p>Sue Richards<br />
The Breast Blog</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
